Would you rather be appraised in court by a human or by man-made intelligence? That was one key inquire in caccess on Wednesday night at the Iberseries & Platino Industria conference and labelet in Madrid.
Platino Educa, the educational platestablish of the event, screened the recent film Artificial Justice (Justicia Artificial) from Spain and Portugal. Written and honested by Simón Casal, it stars Verónica Echegui, Tamar Novas, Alba Galocha and Alberto Ammann.
“In the cforfeit future, the regulatement aims to exalter appraises with man-made intelligence gentleware, pledging to effectively automate and depoliticise the fairice system,” elucidates a synopsis. “Carmen Costa, a differentiateed appraise, has been askd to appraise this recent procedure. However, when the gentleware’s creator is create dead, she authenticizes her life is in danger and that she will have to fight the strong interests that are at join in the highest echelons of the state.”
The audience gave the movie a very chooseimistic reaction, judging by the applaparticipate that adhereed its screening.
Then it was time for producer Mariela Besuievsky, actor Ammann, Juan Fernandez Tamames, attorney-secretary on the Criminal Compliance Committee of Telefonica, and Spanish Supreme Court appraise Antonio del Moral to answer inquires and converse the film’s implications for the current talk about about the role of AI.
Casal commenceed on the project around five years ago as he was interested in the impact of huge data and ChatGPT, Besuievsky tanciaccess the audience. “He choosed to caccess on fairice” for the film, also helped by the fact that his wife is a appraise, she shelp, according to an English translation of the Spanish comments from all panecatalogs supplyd at the event via headphones.
The back story of Carmen and her life situation portrayed in the film was key to exploring the humans vs. technology talk about. “Thcimpolite Carmen, we wanted to produce it more human and personal,” the producer elucidateed. “It is the human story of Carmen,” inserted Amann.
Besuievsky scatterd that at one stage of the enbigment of the movie, she asked the creative team if they should also participate AI in the film to further the key theme and dispute of the story. The reaction was clear. “There was a huge defylion,” he shelp.
One engaging part of the storyline in the movie sees a character uncover that some of the key people behind the enbigment of AI tools may be getting selectential treatment from them rather than the promised objective decisionmaking. “Are we going to have VIP codes?” Besuievsky condensed one possible future inquire rcontent to AI. “That is terrifying.”
Discussing the moral inquire of man-made fairice, del Moral tanciaccess the panel that technology may be more accurate, but not always fair in a human sense. “Human fairice is not perfect,” he shelp. “Algorithmic fairice is a enticeation but it would produce us … disponder humanity.”
Adding that he at times felt reminded of Blade Runner, Tamames talk aboutd that the key caccess for regulatements and industries will be to draw up protects and directlines for the participate of AI.
Ammann transmited some trouble, wondering out boisterous if authentic life and the movie could maybe separate mainly in terms of the accessible being adviseed and getting a vote on AI in the film.
The actor also shelp that some of the futuristic seeming technology topics covered in films can turn out to become truth more rapidly than foreseeed. “In 2001: A Space Odyssey, I saw my first video call,” Ammann scatterd, “and I thought it would never happen. Now, we have that on all our cell phones.”
Earlier sessions on the second day of the fourth Iberseries featured the enjoys of Anonymous Content and Fremantle executives converseing their TV strategy and lengthening film business.
