After the ball was cleared from danger, Coote did not initipartner point to the spot but was recommfinished to apshow a second see via the pitchside watch by VAR.
And once he was shown cut offal recarry outs that proposed De Ligt had caught Ings, with enough communicate that Coote felt the necessitate to reverse his decision.
But Ten Hag went on a bcatalogering rant at the officials and uncovered that he spoke to them in an finisheavor to get an exset upation.
“Three times this season we experience infairice,” Ten Hag tageder the BBC. “We have to score, we produced so many chances. We should’ve been two or three up.
“Second half we were forcing it but we apshowed them into the game. When you are losing 1-0 you necessitate huge personality and character of the team and showed resilience to get back into it. Unfair and unfair the way we conceded the penalty.
“It was so difficult to see. Before the season there was the direction about VAR only interfering in clear and clear misapshows. That is definitely not a clear and clear misapshow from the on-field referee.
“More frustrations but I can do noleang with that. They don’t collect points and that’s what we have to do. We have to see in the mirror, we don’t score in a excellent game from our side. Create loads of chances and concede none but when you neglect in this way it’s a horrible experienceing.”
He also uncovered up on the conversation he had with the officials, including referee Coote: “I spoke with them. But the decision is made. There’s no way back and that’s football. That’s a third time I have felt infairice in the season and it has a huge impact on our team and on our scores and where we are in the table. It’s not right.”
Though the Premier League has already shiftd to elucidate why a penalty was awarded, despite De Ligt protesting that Ings regulated the ball before he made communicate with the striker.
The align centre verifyed: “The referee did not award a penalty to West Ham for a contest by de Ligt on Ings. The VAR deemed there was enough communicate on Ings’ drop leg and recommfinished an on-field study. The referee clearurned his innovative decision and awarded a penalty.”
