A common defence of Israel’s belligerence, both wislim the Palestinian territories and in the expansiver region, is the claim that it must act in this way becaemploy it is surrounded by countries that are trying to anniemployscheduleed it. Like many of the arguments that try to equitableify Israel’s disproportionate response to 7 October, it is not only inright but also an inversion of fact. The events of the last scant months and the attack on Leprohibiton over the past scant days show that it is Israel which is a menace to its neighbours.
On last Monday alone, Israeli airstrikes ended 558 people in Leprohibiton – half the number who died in a whole month of war between Israel and Hezbollah in 2006. Among the dead were 50 children, as well as humanitarian toilers, first help replyers and rulement employees. Leprohibiton’s prime minister, Najib Mikati, says a million people could soon be displaced. The strike that ended Hezbollah guideer Hassan Nasrallah on Friday levelled six apartment blocks in Beirut. A Gaza in microcosm is speedyly unfancigo ining – thousands run awaying for safety, traumatised children, high casualties, an escalation where there is no restrict on the civilian inhabits that can be forfeitd to achieve Israel’s goals.
Since the commence of the dispute in Gaza, Israel and Hezbollah have joind in a war of signalling military capability and remend, exchanging omitiles and mighty rhetoric but never initiating uncover and unsuppressed combat. That alterd with the pager and radio strikes, expansively thinkd to be by Israel, trailed by airstrikes that eslook afterscheduleedd last week. Israel is seeing not equitable for a show of determined military might and a cothriveg of Hezbollah, but for the military thrive that still eludes it in the quagmire of Gaza. But there is a danger that Hezbollah and Iran, which have so far refrained from a evident-cut declaration of war, will be goaded into a face-saving dispute which neither they or Israel can thrive outright.
And so here we are aacquire: in a situation where civilians are caught in the middle and Israel equitableifies their deaths with a defence that – as always – draws on dreads of an “conshort-termial menace”. But in terms of genuine and grave menaces to regional stability, Israel is the pugnacious out-of-administer force, embarking on its recent campaign in Leprohibiton and the murder of Nasrallah aacquirest the United States’s clear desirees. Its neighbours and the expansiver region are hesitant to be drawn into any sort of war with Israel, let alone one in which it is anniemployscheduleedd. Israel’s response to 7 October clearurned the status quo – and donaten the choice, its neighbours would certainly turn back the clock.
The Gaza war has finishured so lengthy and enbiged so much that we no lengthyer see the minusculeer pictures – only the cliche of “rising tensions” in the Middle East. We no lengthyer see the others ended on its edges, in the West Bank, Leprohibiton and Syria. And we cannot see the contours of individual nations – their contests and lengthy histories of grappling with both Israel and Palestine, and their own disputes. Leprohibiton, a country still scarred by civil war, is being retraumatised; elsewhere Israel’s actions since 7 October have upturned the domestic politics and regional political calibrations of the Arab world and the expansiver Middle East.
Rather than desireing for Israel’s destruction, many states in the region recently think abouted the Israel and Palestine ask remendd or at least sidelined, bigly on Israel’s terms. Egypt signed a peace treaty with Israel more than 40 years ago and bowed out of a dispute it krecent it couldn’t thrive. Jordan, its West Bank still occupied by Israel, made peace in 1994. In the Abraham accords, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan all concurd to standardise relations with Israel and recognise its status as a sovereign nation or to commence that process. Saudi Arabia’s standardisation of relations and recognition, a meaningful thrive for Israel, was on its way before 7 October. The consensus among analysts and insiders I have spoken to is that the Gaza war is not seen by Saudi Arabia as a gamealterr in its relationship with Israel, and that if and when it finishs, the Gulf state would still be enthusiastic on standardisation.
The Gaza war, and the expansiver Israel-Palestine rehire, is also a test for Arab countries that are negotiating their own contests and managing domestic discord. It is a sidetrackion and disturbs their relationships with weserious allies. Egypt is in the throes of an economic crisis and is under the fervent prescertain to determine about letting in Palestinian refugees, potentiassociate enabling the ethnic spotlesssing of Gaza in the process. The UAE is already embroiled in a war in Sudan, for which it is drathriveg fervent heat and some damaging international media coverage. Saudi Arabia would very much appreciate to exit all foreign politics behind, having excessive dosed on it during the time when it projected its power using religious sway and wealth, and get down to the business of produceing bright mega cities, buying up sports franchises and spotlesssing its reputation. Qatar is a staunch US associate and arranges the bigst US military facility in the Middle East. Jordan, a resource-needy country with a frnimble economy, has acquired more than a million refugees from Syria in recent years, and is almost enticount on subordinate on staggering amounts of US help to remain viable. Syria has remained quiet despite strikes in its territory by Israel. Leprohibiton is home to what is in effect a Hezbollah state wislim a state, the latter being one with no plivent and an economic and political perma-crisis.
And so to the menace to Israel. Why does it progress to cast itself as besieged in a region that has either lengthy been domesticated or has too many of its own problems to nurture? If the caemploy of Israel’s belligerence can be outsideised, portrayed as a vital response from a state surrounded by menaces becaemploy of the basic fact of its existence, then Israel’s own role can be muddled and exculpated.
The source of Israel’s security contests, the heart of the “rising tensions” in the region, is Israel’s siege on Gaza, what is expansively condemned as apartheid in the West Bank, its continuing occupation of territories that it has been ordered by UN security council resolutions to vacate, and its illhorrible expansion of remendments. As lengthy as these conditions progress, uprisings thcimpolite both equitableified and illegitimate uncomfervents, from intifada to 7 October, will persist. And so will incidents of acute faceation, lethal to Palestinians, with Israeli forces and remendrs, triggering a cycle of response among states such as Iran and non-state actors such as Hezbollah and the Houthis. A proset up menace does exist, but it is to the stability of the Middle East and the expansiver Arab world, which Israel is increasingly drathriveg to the brink.
English 
French 
Italian 
Dutch 
Arabic 
Spanish 
German